Observation is the total denial of analysis
Ojai - 4 May 1980
Public Talk 2
0:37 | I wonder why you |
are all here. | |
0:49 | I think |
we ought to consider | |
0:55 | that this is not |
an entertainment, | |
1:03 | this is not something you go to |
a Sunday morning | |
1:08 | or a Saturday afternoon, |
to be entertained, | |
1:12 | to be stimulated, |
to be talked at. | |
1:20 | As we pointed out |
yesterday | |
1:27 | we have got a great many |
problems confronting us: | |
1:34 | political, religious, |
economic, social | |
1:40 | and also |
personal problems. | |
1:48 | And few of us are free |
from any kind of authority, | |
2:04 | religious, psychological, |
social. | |
2:14 | Apparently we have |
become incapable | |
2:22 | of being responsible |
for ourselves. | |
2:33 | The psychologists, the scientists, |
the preachers, the priests, | |
2:39 | the religious organisations |
tell us what to do. | |
2:47 | And happily the Indian gurus |
are no longer | |
2:51 | in favour in this country. |
2:57 | That wave has passed. |
3:02 | And there are people too eager |
to tell you what is enlightenment, | |
3:07 | how you should reach it |
how to meditate, | |
3:11 | what to do, and so on |
and so on and so on. | |
3:17 | Here we are doing |
nothing of that kind. | |
3:22 | The speaker means it. |
3:26 | Here, if you are serious, |
we are thinking together | |
3:39 | which does not mean that you |
accept what the speaker says, | |
3:46 | it does not mean that you have |
your own particular point of view, | |
3:55 | your own particular |
experience, and hold on to it. | |
4:00 | Then, thinking together |
becomes utterly impossible. | |
4:09 | It is absolutely necessary |
seeing what the world is: | |
4:17 | utter confusion, terrorism, |
kidnapping, | |
4:29 | the totalitarian states |
with their image | |
4:35 | of how society |
should be run | |
4:39 | and the other side |
with their image | |
4:42 | are also very clear |
on this matter. | |
4:48 | And so as you observe |
without any prejudice | |
4:56 | that the world is |
in a great crisis, | |
5:01 | the crisis |
must be answered. | |
5:06 | Human beings have created |
this crisis: by their lives, | |
5:12 | by their beliefs, by their |
parochial attitudes, | |
5:20 | by their so-called |
individualistic freedom | |
5:24 | which is no longer free |
but controlled, | |
5:30 | we have created this |
conflict in the world. | |
5:38 | And I am sure most of you, |
if you have observed, | |
5:43 | would recognise |
that fact: | |
5:48 | that society |
has come into being | |
5:53 | by human greed, |
5:57 | human behaviour, human illusions |
with their many, many images, | |
6:07 | with national divisions, |
6:11 | religious adherence, |
6:15 | accepting some doctrines, |
beliefs, dogmas, rituals. | |
6:21 | And so there has been |
throughout the world | |
6:25 | a series of wars, conflicts, |
brutalities, cruelties and so on. | |
6:37 | And as we said yesterday |
6:42 | there are very few people |
6:47 | who say, 'Let us really |
solve this problem, | |
6:53 | this problem of conflict |
between man and man, | |
6:56 | between human beings'. |
7:01 | There are many explanations |
for this conflict: | |
7:08 | some historical, some factual, |
some imaginary, | |
7:13 | some based on their concepts, |
images and so on. | |
7:21 | But when the speaker says, |
'observe', he is not analysing. | |
7:32 | Please, let's be very |
clear on that point. | |
7:37 | Analysis, specially psychoanalysis, |
like Communism, | |
7:43 | is an unfortunate incident |
in our life. | |
7:51 | All right? |
7:56 | Please, if I may point out |
what the speaker says, | |
8:02 | don't get irritated with him, |
don't get angry with him, | |
8:08 | don't throw a bomb, |
don't shoot | |
8:13 | but let us |
talk it over together. | |
8:19 | Because life |
is very complex | |
8:24 | and requires |
that we investigate it, | |
8:31 | that we look at it. |
8:34 | You may not like |
what you see, | |
8:39 | you may disagree |
with it, | |
8:43 | you may say, 'What you |
are saying is nonsense' | |
8:50 | or contradict it angrily. |
8:56 | But we are merely observing |
what is taking place, first. | |
9:09 | In that observation analysis |
has no place whatsoever. | |
9:18 | We'll go into it. |
Please have patience. | |
9:23 | And if you are |
really serious | |
9:28 | don't just attend one talk |
and say, 'I have understood it' | |
9:31 | or 'He's talking nonsense' |
and walk away, | |
9:34 | you have to listen to the whole, |
you have to read the whole book. | |
9:40 | You have to, as the |
commercial people say, | |
9:43 | you have to buy |
the package! | |
9:49 | Not just one part of it, |
which may suit you, | |
9:54 | which may be pleasant, |
but you have to buy | |
9:57 | - an unfortunate word - |
you have to buy, | |
10:02 | if I may use it, |
the whole thing. | |
10:06 | So please, |
if you are serious, | |
10:10 | attend all the talks and |
go to the very end of it. | |
10:18 | This is not an invitation |
to have more people; | |
10:23 | just a person who is serious |
has to listen to the whole story, | |
10:33 | read the whole book, |
10:36 | and then see if it is right, |
true, false, or illusory. | |
10:44 | But just reading the first page |
and saying, 'It is all nonsense' | |
10:49 | or the first chapter, |
which may not please you | |
10:55 | and throw the book away. |
The book is your life. | |
11:01 | A very, |
very complex life. | |
11:06 | And you have |
to have the patience, | |
11:10 | integrity, observation |
11:15 | and the responsibility of reading |
this book, which is yourself, | |
11:26 | so completely, |
so thoroughly, | |
11:33 | so as a whole, so that we can |
go beyond the book, | |
11:40 | the book |
which is yourself. | |
11:46 | So, as we were saying, |
the world is in conflict. | |
11:52 | The world, which is the economic, |
social, religious, political, | |
11:59 | is created by all human |
beings, whether in this country | |
12:07 | or in Europe, |
or in India and so on. | |
12:10 | We are responsible for it. |
12:15 | And few people, the intellectuals, |
the psychologists, | |
12:26 | the psychobiologists, |
the scientists | |
12:30 | have said, ' Let us solve this |
problem of human conflict'. | |
12:41 | And we, who are not |
professionals, | |
12:47 | we are just |
ordinary human beings | |
12:52 | with all our anxieties, fears, |
pleasures, sorrows, | |
13:02 | the fear of death and so on, |
we have to resolve them. | |
13:09 | It becomes more and more |
necessary that we resolve them | |
13:16 | otherwise human beings are |
going to destroy each other. | |
13:24 | This is again a fact |
which is actually going on. | |
13:30 | So it behoves us that we think |
about the problem together. | |
13:42 | To think together implies |
that you and the speaker | |
13:49 | must be free of our |
particular narrow | |
13:53 | provincial parochial attitudes, |
beliefs, dogmas, experiences, | |
14:02 | so that we can meet |
each other. | |
14:08 | So what is the problem? |
14:11 | As we asked yesterday, |
we are asking it again today: | |
14:16 | What is the problem? |
14:18 | The problem is essentially |
a crisis in our consciousness, | |
14:27 | a crisis in our mind, |
in our brain, in our heart. | |
14:32 | That is the heart |
of the matter. | |
14:40 | And as we said |
also yesterday | |
14:47 | - and I hope you don't mind |
the thing being repeated - | |
14:53 | that our brain, which is the |
centre of all of our existence, | |
15:02 | our brain has evolved |
through time, | |
15:06 | through millions and |
millions of years. | |
15:11 | Through those years |
it has created for itself | |
15:17 | every form of |
self protective device. | |
15:28 | It has sought - if you |
go into it yourself | |
15:32 | and not merely repeat |
what psychologists | |
15:35 | and the brain specialists |
talk about - | |
15:38 | it has always sought security, |
otherwise it can't function. | |
15:45 | Right? |
It must have security. | |
15:50 | So it begins |
to create images, | |
15:57 | it begins to create illusions |
in which it takes safety. | |
16:06 | So it has created a certain |
pattern of existence | |
16:12 | for itself, |
which is our life. | |
16:18 | And it has developed |
through time and therefore | |
16:25 | there is always this question |
of acquiring knowledge, | |
16:32 | using that knowledge |
to be secure in life. | |
16:39 | You are following |
all this, I hope. | |
16:43 | Because after all knowledge |
is the most important | |
16:48 | factor in our life: |
16:51 | knowledge with regard to |
some technological activities, | |
17:00 | knowledge about the |
psyche, about ourselves. | |
17:07 | That knowledge has been |
acquired through millennia, | |
17:14 | stored up in the brain, |
17:18 | the brain with all its cells |
and so on. | |
17:23 | As we said yesterday the speaker |
has not read any of these books, | |
17:31 | thank God! |
17:34 | He has observed the activities |
of human beings, | |
17:40 | the activities |
of his own brain, | |
17:45 | which is, through |
observing reactions, | |
17:51 | pleasurable, painful, sensitive, |
and so on and so on. | |
17:57 | So it is a direct perception, |
not acquired second-hand. | |
18:07 | And this is important in our |
communication with each other. | |
18:16 | So this brain has acquired |
tremendous knowledge | |
18:22 | so it has to be |
completely secure. | |
18:28 | Whether that knowledge |
is illusory, | |
18:34 | actual, fanciful, |
imaginary, | |
18:41 | pleasurable and so on, it has |
created a pattern of existence | |
18:50 | for itself so that |
it can never be harmed, | |
18:57 | wounded, both physically |
as well as psychologically. | |
19:05 | This is important |
to understand | |
19:10 | because we live |
with images. | |
19:17 | Our religions are nothing |
but images | |
19:21 | created by the mind, |
by thought. | |
19:28 | And that which has been |
created as a holy image | |
19:34 | you then |
begin to worship it. | |
19:39 | But it is essentially |
the desire, | |
19:44 | the necessity for it to be secure, |
to be safe, to be protected. | |
19:55 | But knowledge is always |
accompanied by ignorance. | |
20:04 | Right? |
20:08 | Because knowledge |
can never be complete. | |
20:13 | Please see |
the importance of this: | |
20:16 | knowledge |
can never be complete. | |
20:20 | You may acquire great information |
about the world, about matter, | |
20:25 | about the heavens - not spiritual |
heavens, I don't mean that - | |
20:32 | heavens: the skies, |
the universe, | |
20:36 | but whatever knowledge |
science has acquired | |
20:42 | and transmitted |
through generations | |
20:46 | it is still within |
the area of ignorance, | |
20:51 | within the area of shadow, of the |
shadow which is non-knowledge. | |
21:01 | So see |
what we have done, | |
21:04 | how the brain |
has tricked itself | |
21:07 | into security |
in knowledge | |
21:12 | and holding on |
to that knowledge | |
21:17 | and yet it has never |
discovered for itself | |
21:20 | that knowledge can never |
be complete and therefore | |
21:23 | whatever action |
that takes place | |
21:26 | from that knowledge |
must be incomplete. | |
21:30 | I hope you are |
following all this. | |
21:33 | Please, |
we are not intellectual. | |
21:39 | Intellect has its place. |
21:44 | The capacity of the intellect is |
to observe, distinguish, discern, | |
21:56 | but if that intellect |
becomes the whole of life | |
22:05 | as it is now becoming, |
22:08 | covering |
the whole field of life. | |
22:11 | That is, a part, |
22:15 | - the intellect is a part of |
the whole of human existence - | |
22:20 | when a part takes |
supreme importance | |
22:25 | then inevitably all action |
must be fragmented, | |
22:31 | incomplete |
and therefore conflict. | |
22:35 | I hope you are |
following all this. | |
22:38 | Right, may I go on? |
22:41 | No, I can go on, but as we said, |
we are thinking together. | |
22:51 | Because the speaker is not selling |
you anything - thank God! | |
22:59 | He is not asking you to follow |
him, all that tommy rot. | |
23:08 | The speaker says the world |
is in such a misery, confusion, | |
23:14 | turmoil, for God's sake, |
let's think together. | |
23:22 | And to think together implies |
we must be free to observe, | |
23:30 | not I observe |
and tell you | |
23:33 | or you observe and say, |
' Oh, you don't see it properly' | |
23:36 | but together observe. |
23:41 | Right? |
23:46 | As we said, analysis has |
no place in observation. | |
23:57 | Analysis is the discovery |
of the cause and the effect. Right? | |
24:09 | It's all right, sir |
- the bird. | |
24:17 | Perhaps it likes us! |
24:28 | Please understand this, |
and go into it carefully | |
24:33 | because observation is entirely |
different from analysis. | |
24:44 | Observation is immediate: |
you see the tree. | |
24:52 | But if you begin to analyse |
you never see the tree. | |
24:57 | Right? |
Understand this. | |
25:01 | That is, to observe means: |
seeing, being sensitive, | |
25:14 | aware, and without any |
movement of thought. | |
25:22 | Just to observe. |
I wonder if... Right? | |
25:27 | I am going slowly. |
When I said 'without thought' | |
25:31 | I am going to go into it. |
Be patient. | |
25:36 | So observation is not analysis. |
Analysis implies the analyser | |
25:45 | who is analysing |
something outside of himself. | |
25:51 | The analyser thinks |
he understands, | |
25:54 | has superior knowledge |
25:58 | and he is analysing |
something outside of himself. | |
26:04 | But if you observe very carefully |
the analyser is the analysed. | |
26:12 | Right? |
26:14 | You follow this? |
26:23 | If you see that, |
not as an idea, but as a fact. | |
26:30 | You understand? |
26:32 | Like anger is not different |
from you, you are anger! | |
26:43 | I'm sorry sir. I said |
I would be careful. | |
27:03 | When you are angry, |
at the moment of anger, | |
27:09 | there is no division between |
the I and the anger. | |
27:16 | But later on, a few seconds later, |
you say, 'I have been angry'. | |
27:22 | So you have separated |
yourself from | |
27:26 | that reaction which you |
have called anger. | |
27:30 | So in the same way |
when you analyse yourself | |
27:36 | or being analysed |
by another, | |
27:40 | the analyser is part |
of the analysis, | |
27:44 | part of the thing |
which is analysing, | |
27:47 | it is not separate |
from the analysed. Right? | |
27:53 | Please understand this, go into |
it in yourself as we are talking. | |
27:58 | This is thinking together. |
28:01 | The speaker is not |
telling you what to think, | |
28:07 | which is generally |
what people do: | |
28:11 | the professors, the analysts, |
the preachers | |
28:15 | and all the rest of it |
- we are not doing that. | |
28:18 | What we are saying is, |
as long as there is a division | |
28:23 | between the analyser and the |
analysed there must be conflict. | |
28:28 | Right? |
28:30 | But that is an illusion, |
it is not a fact. | |
28:37 | The fact is the observer |
is the observed, psychologically. | |
28:45 | Right? |
28:48 | I observe that tree, but the tree |
is not me, I am not the tree. | |
28:57 | But psychologically, |
inwardly, | |
29:00 | the reaction of anger, |
greed, jealousy, is me. | |
29:11 | I am not separate |
from that. | |
29:15 | But we have separated it |
in order to do something about it. | |
29:21 | Vous avez compris? |
I mean, you understand? | |
29:25 | I feel violence and I create |
the idea of non-violence | |
29:35 | and I will do something |
about the violence. | |
29:40 | But the fact is |
I am violence, | |
29:45 | I am not different |
from the fact. | |
29:50 | Then a totally different |
movement takes place. | |
29:54 | You understand? |
29:56 | I wonder |
if you understand. | |
30:00 | We are now thinking together |
to eliminate conflict. | |
30:07 | You understand? |
30:09 | As long as there is a division |
between the observer, | |
30:15 | psychologically, |
the analyser | |
30:17 | and the analysed, |
there must be conflict. | |
30:22 | As long as there are |
divisions between people | |
30:25 | there must be conflict: religious, |
economic, social, political. | |
30:31 | There must be conflict |
as long as there is a Jew, | |
30:34 | as long as there is an Arab, |
there must be conflict. | |
30:38 | So wherever there is |
division psychologically | |
30:43 | there must be conflict. |
That's a law! | |
30:49 | So in thinking together we see |
that wherever there is analysis, | |
30:58 | psychoanalysis, |
psycho-therapy, all that, | |
31:05 | in that process there is division, |
and it must breed conflict. | |
31:15 | I forgot! |
(Laughter) | |
31:22 | And observing is |
the total denial of analysis. | |
31:37 | I wonder if you |
understand this. | |
31:39 | Our whole conditioning |
is to analyse. | |
31:46 | Right? |
31:49 | Our education, everything, |
is either: do, don't do, | |
31:55 | this is right, this is wrong, |
this should be, this should not be | |
31:58 | and so on and so on |
and so on. | |
32:01 | And recently, in the |
last hundred years, | |
32:06 | psychoanalytical processes |
have come into being, | |
32:10 | like communism, which are both |
unfortunate things to happen. | |
32:20 | Because really if you observe, |
both are the same. | |
32:24 | I won't go into it now, |
it's too long. | |
32:29 | They have analysed history |
and come to some conclusion | |
32:34 | - you follow - |
historical conclusion, | |
32:37 | according to that |
they have built a pattern, | |
32:40 | the theories with their image, |
with their analysed state | |
32:47 | and created |
totalitarianism. | |
32:50 | And the psychologists |
with their analysis and so on | |
32:54 | have created the same |
pattern in a different field. | |
32:59 | You don't see it, |
but it doesn't matter. | |
33:03 | So what we are saying is, |
together, observe. | |
33:10 | Now, |
observe the conflict. Right? | |
33:17 | So what is the conflict? |
33:24 | Now, how do you |
observe conflict? | |
33:28 | You understand |
my question? | |
33:31 | You, as a human being |
33:34 | - if you will permit me, |
the speaker, to say so - | |
33:39 | you as a human being |
are in conflict, | |
33:48 | whether you are aware of it |
or you have neglected it | |
33:52 | or you don't want to look |
at it, or you think God, | |
33:57 | somebody is going to save you, |
you are essentially in conflict. | |
34:07 | And, as we said |
yesterday | |
34:12 | how do you approach this |
problem? You understand? | |
34:20 | How do you look |
at the problem? | |
34:27 | That is, how do you come to it, |
how do you look at it, | |
34:32 | how do you approach it, |
how do you observe it? | |
34:38 | You see, we are |
talking over together. | |
34:40 | I am not telling you |
how to observe it. | |
34:44 | I am only asking you |
how you come to it, | |
34:48 | how you receive it, |
how you look at it. | |
34:57 | If you observe |
- or aware - | |
35:01 | are you aware of this conflict |
without any choice? | |
35:08 | A choiceless awareness. |
You understand? | |
35:13 | Or, becoming aware of this conflict, |
you say, 'I must resolve it'. | |
35:24 | You understand? When you |
say,' I must resolve it' | |
35:27 | you have already separated |
yourself from the fact. | |
35:32 | I wonder |
if you see that. | |
35:36 | Are you following me, |
some of you? | |
35:38 | Come on, sirs, |
let's move! | |
35:43 | Please, together |
we are thinking, | |
35:48 | together alone we can |
resolve this problem. | |
35:52 | Nobody else in the world |
can. | |
35:59 | So your approach to the problem |
matters enormously! | |
36:11 | If you have a motive, |
that motive dictates | |
36:16 | the direction which the problem |
must take. You understand? | |
36:25 | So your approach |
must be free from motive. | |
36:31 | Your approach must be free |
of the desire to resolve it. | |
36:38 | See the difficulty. |
36:44 | If your approach is conditioned |
by your education, by your desire, | |
36:49 | by your pleasure, |
you can never solve it. | |
36:54 | So the mind must |
observe this problem, | |
37:02 | free from all its |
motives, desires | |
37:11 | and trying to resolve it, because |
you are the problem. Right? | |
37:16 | Have you understood? |
37:18 | You are the problem. |
Not: conflict is the problem. | |
37:26 | Right? Can we go from there? |
Please, conflict is you. | |
37:34 | I am not telling you |
this. | |
37:36 | You, in your observation, |
you have discovered it. | |
37:41 | In your thinking together |
we have discovered the fact: | |
37:46 | conflict is not outside, |
it is inside | |
37:50 | and that conflict is you! |
37:58 | You may say,' I am God' or |
'Somebody is going to save me'. | |
38:03 | You know, we have played |
this kind of trick for millennia. | |
38:06 | You understand? |
For God's sake, let's grow up. | |
38:17 | So the problem now |
is our consciousness. | |
38:23 | You understand now? |
38:26 | Our consciousness, which |
means: the way you think, | |
38:31 | the way you live, the way you |
believe, the way you react, | |
38:36 | your behaviour, your thinking, |
all that is your consciousness | |
38:42 | which is your life. |
38:46 | That consciousness |
is you! | |
38:50 | Please, this is really |
important to understand, | |
38:52 | give your attention |
for a few minutes. | |
38:56 | The whole of that consciousness |
is essentially you. | |
39:01 | The content of that consciousness |
makes consciousness, | |
39:05 | you understand? |
39:12 | The content of consciousness of |
a Protestant is what he believes, | |
39:17 | his rituals, his images of |
religion, Jesus and all that | |
39:24 | and his nationalistic, his |
particular attitudes, opinions, | |
39:29 | his relationship with another, |
his hurts, his anxiety, his sorrow. | |
39:35 | Right? |
39:38 | And the Catholic with his... |
content of his consciousness | |
39:44 | and the Hindu with his... |
and the Buddhist and so on, | |
39:49 | the Arabs and the Jews. |
You follow all this? | |
39:52 | That consciousness is put |
together by its content. | |
40:02 | And as long as |
that content remains | |
40:09 | the conflict must go on. |
Have you got this point? | |
40:19 | This content has been put |
together through time, | |
40:25 | it isn't |
one day's acquirement. | |
40:29 | Our brain is the result |
of time, evolution. | |
40:34 | Our brain is not |
your brain and my brain | |
40:39 | but |
the brain of mankind. | |
40:42 | This is difficult for you |
to see, and even recognise | |
40:47 | because we have been so |
conditioned that it is my brain. | |
40:52 | You understand? |
And it is your brain. | |
40:56 | But if you observe... |
41:03 | If you observe, human beings, |
right throughout the world, | |
41:11 | go through enormous |
turmoil, poverty, anxiety, | |
41:18 | insecurity, confusion, |
psychologically wounded, | |
41:26 | fear, fear of being hurt, physically, |
fear of psychological hurts, | |
41:36 | fear of death, and the enquiry: |
what is there beyond? | |
41:42 | And the innumerable images man |
has created in the name of God | |
41:54 | and worshipping those images |
right through the world. | |
41:59 | That is the content |
of our consciousness. Right? | |
42:04 | And as long as there's that |
content, which is always divisive, | |
42:09 | which is always fragmented, |
our action must be fragmented. | |
42:15 | Right? |
42:18 | We are thinking together, |
I am not telling you. | |
42:25 | So the problem then is: |
is it possible for the content | |
42:33 | of that consciousness |
to be dissolved? | |
42:38 | You understand? |
42:40 | Go into it a little bit. |
42:43 | That is, one of the contents |
of that consciousness | |
42:51 | is the psychological wounds that |
we have received from childhood. | |
42:56 | You know them, don't you? |
You are all familiar with them. | |
43:06 | That's probably one of |
the major conflicts, | |
43:10 | major factor |
in our consciousness. | |
43:15 | We will go into that |
completely together | |
43:18 | so that together |
we dissolve it immediately. | |
43:24 | You understand? It is not |
analysis but pure observation. | |
43:32 | Analysis implies a concept |
from which you are working. | |
43:38 | You understand? |
43:41 | Right sir? |
43:44 | In observation |
there is no concept. | |
43:48 | So we are |
thinking together. | |
43:52 | Human beings, from the |
very beginning of time, | |
43:59 | have been hurt |
inwardly: | |
44:07 | by a casual remark, by a look, |
by a word, by being sarcastic, | |
44:17 | by denying |
what you hold dear, | |
44:25 | what you consider the most |
important thing in your life, | |
44:30 | and somebody comes |
and treads on it, | |
44:33 | you feel |
terribly wounded. | |
44:37 | Right? |
44:41 | And we are asking: the consequences |
of that wound is to resist, | |
44:50 | build a wall round yourself, |
which is to isolate yourself. | |
44:55 | Observe all this, |
please, observe. | |
44:57 | We are not analysing, we are |
just observing the story, | |
45:03 | reading the story of the hurt, |
reading, which is not analysing. | |
45:08 | You understand? |
Come on, right? | |
45:16 | You resist, fear enters into it, |
not to be hurt more. | |
45:23 | So gradually that hurt has |
helped you to isolate yourself. | |
45:31 | Right? |
See the fact. | |
45:34 | The consequences of that |
isolation is more fear, | |
45:40 | more anxiety and so on and so on |
and so on - the consequences. | |
45:46 | So the fact is |
that you are hurt. | |
45:50 | And what is hurt? |
45:54 | You understand |
my question? | |
45:56 | What is the thing |
that is hurt? | |
46:04 | Are you all interested |
in all this? | |
46:05 | Q:Yes. |
46:09 | K:It's your life anyhow. |
46:13 | If you are not interested |
I am sorry for you. | |
46:22 | What is the thing |
that is hurt? | |
46:28 | Is it your psyche, |
is it your... | |
46:35 | - observing, we are not |
analysing, observing - psyche, | |
46:41 | or basically the image that |
you have built about yourself? | |
46:49 | You understand |
my question? | |
46:53 | The image one |
has built about oneself. | |
46:59 | I might build an image about |
myself, saying, I am a great man, | |
47:04 | I have an audience, |
you know, blah, blah, blah. | |
47:09 | I travel all over the world, |
how important it is, and so on. | |
47:14 | I have reached |
some state. You follow? | |
47:16 | I have built an image |
about myself | |
47:19 | as you have built an |
image about yourself. | |
47:23 | I haven't got it, |
but it doesn't matter. | |
47:27 | Because from childhood |
I have never wanted an image, | |
47:33 | it is too stupid. |
47:40 | So having created |
an image about oneself: | |
47:47 | noble, ignoble, or inferior |
or superior, whatever it is, | |
47:51 | ugly, beautiful, with |
fanciful decoration | |
47:56 | and romantic, sentimental, |
you know the image | |
48:01 | that each one has. |
That gets hurt. Right? | |
48:12 | So can you - we are talking |
over together please - | |
48:19 | can one be free |
of the image? | |
48:25 | And who is the creator |
of the image? | |
48:30 | You are following |
all this? | |
48:33 | Oh lord, you see you are not |
thinking together, | |
48:36 | I am telling you, |
asking the questions. | |
48:40 | It doesn't matter. We are |
thinking together, I hope. | |
48:46 | Who is the creator |
of this image? | |
48:54 | Because in that image |
there is safety. You understand? | |
48:59 | There is security, there is what |
you would call identification: | |
49:07 | national identification, |
religious identification, | |
49:12 | economic identification, democrat, |
republican - you follow? | |
49:17 | You have - this image has been |
created from childhood. | |
49:23 | Right? Through |
education and so on. | |
49:28 | Who is the creator |
of all this? | |
49:43 | As we said, knowledge |
is the factor of this image. Right? | |
49:53 | I wonder |
if you meet it. | |
49:57 | Our experience |
at all levels of life, | |
50:02 | as a carpenter, as a |
scientist, as a housewife, | |
50:06 | home-builder as it is called now, |
and so on and so on and so on, | |
50:12 | we all have created images |
for ourselves. | |
50:21 | And when that image |
is questioned, doubted, | |
50:31 | somebody puts a pin into it, |
you get hurt. | |
50:37 | As long as you have |
an image about yourself | |
50:40 | you are going |
to get hurt. | |
50:47 | Like a man who says,' I have |
achieved enlightenment' - you follow - | |
50:51 | and he is talking about |
environment | |
50:54 | preaching about |
environment | |
50:56 | such a man knows nothing about |
environment - about enlightenment. | |
51:02 | It is just his concept. |
You follow? | |
51:04 | So is it possible then |
to live a life, a daily life | |
51:12 | without this image. |
And who creates this image? | |
51:19 | It is the result of knowledge. |
Obviously. | |
51:27 | Knowledge that the mind, |
51:29 | the brain has acquired |
through centuries | |
51:36 | and that knowledge has been |
translated as the image | |
51:43 | and that image |
predominates. | |
51:47 | But that image is always living |
within the field of ignorance. | |
51:52 | I wonder |
if you see that. | |
51:56 | Because knowledge can never |
be complete. Right? | |
52:00 | So whatever knowledge |
psychologically one has acquired | |
52:05 | it is surrounded by the |
shadow of ignorance. | |
52:12 | Right? |
52:13 | So the problem is |
52:16 | - are you interested |
in all this? - | |
52:19 | so the problem is: |
52:22 | is it possible to be free |
of psychological knowledge | |
52:30 | and yet not identify the technological |
knowledge psychologically? | |
52:41 | You understand? |
52:43 | I wonder |
if you see this. | |
52:47 | I'll go into it. We are talking |
together as two friends, | |
52:53 | enquiring into the |
problem of conflict | |
52:57 | and seeing the necessity, |
53:03 | the absolute urgency |
of ending conflict | |
53:08 | because if we don't |
end it, you and I, | |
53:12 | the speaker, are going |
to destroy the world. | |
53:16 | Which we are doing now. |
53:22 | So the question is: experience, |
knowledge, memory | |
53:34 | - see the sequence of it - |
first, experience | |
53:41 | then out of that experience |
acquiring knowledge | |
53:47 | given by others |
or by oneself | |
53:50 | and that is stored up |
in the brain as memory. | |
53:56 | Right? |
53:57 | That memory, that knowledge, |
that experience creates this image. | |
54:04 | But that knowledge has never |
acknowledged the fact | |
54:09 | that it is incomplete. |
54:13 | You understand? It must live |
in the shadow of ignorance | |
54:18 | however much it may advance, |
or ascend. Right? | |
54:25 | It must be |
in the field of ignorance. | |
54:32 | And therefore |
must be in conflict. Right? | |
54:39 | So is it possible |
for that enormous knowledge | |
54:43 | that one has acquired, |
knowledge technologically, | |
54:49 | the tremendous knowledge which |
we have acquired technologically | |
54:53 | as a carpenter, as a |
plumber, as a bureaucrat, | |
54:59 | as a politician and |
so on and so on, | |
55:03 | that knowledge not to be |
identified with the psyche | |
55:10 | and so the psychological |
knowledge is maintained. | |
55:13 | You are following? No, |
you are not following. | |
55:18 | I'll explain it. |
55:20 | Technological knowledge |
is necessary, absolutely, | |
55:25 | because otherwise |
we can't do anything. | |
55:28 | Why should we have |
psychological knowledge? | |
55:34 | You understand |
my question? | |
55:36 | We have. |
55:40 | The knowledge |
has become the image. | |
55:46 | And that image |
is going to be hurt | |
55:50 | and from that hurt, |
the consequences of that hurt | |
55:53 | is isolation, more conflict, |
more fear, | |
55:55 | more misery, more |
destructive activity. | |
56:01 | So we are asking: |
56:03 | why should there be any |
psychological knowledge at all? | |
56:11 | You understand, sir? |
56:14 | Why? |
56:18 | Go into it. Let's talk about it, |
let's look at it. | |
56:26 | Is it the fear |
- please listen - | |
56:29 | is it the fear of |
not being anything? | |
56:34 | You follow? |
56:37 | All our education says, |
be something. | |
56:42 | Right? Or become |
something. | |
56:47 | Successful, noble, brave, |
put away cowardice, | |
56:53 | become holy, meditate. |
You follow? | |
57:01 | So all knowledge is purely |
technological. Right? | |
57:10 | Why should we have |
the other? | |
57:13 | I don't know if you are |
thinking together, observing. | |
57:18 | Which means what? |
57:23 | To have no psychological |
knowledge. You understand, sir? | |
57:28 | What it means? |
57:34 | And is one, in that |
observation, discovering | |
57:39 | the utter emptiness |
of life? | |
57:44 | You understand? |
57:47 | The utter meaningless |
of life, and so, | |
57:50 | deeply feeling that, |
57:53 | creates the image and |
hold on to that image. | |
58:00 | You are following |
all this? | |
58:03 | Is it that? |
58:08 | That because if you have no image |
you are nothing. | |
58:16 | Which means not-a-thing. |
You understand? | |
58:20 | Nothing means |
not-a-thing. | |
58:25 | That is, thing is created |
by thought, by the mind. | |
58:31 | I wonder if you follow all this? |
No, this is too much. | |
58:39 | So is that why we |
acknowledge being hurt | |
58:45 | and hold on to it because that |
is something that we have, | |
58:53 | some precious thing |
that we hold on to, | |
58:58 | as your belief, your belief in |
some religious dogma, image | |
59:03 | and so on, you hold on to that |
because without that what are you? | |
59:13 | So can we, in thinking over |
together, see this simple fact | |
59:23 | that our life as it is, |
is utterly meaningless. Right? | |
59:34 | You are unwilling |
to face it. | |
59:37 | Utterly meaningless, and |
so deeply meaningless | |
59:40 | so you create |
all the images, | |
59:43 | the beliefs, the dogmas, the |
rituals, the popes, the gurus | |
59:52 | and you are going |
to get hurt. | |
59:57 | And a man who sees this, |
observes it, | |
1:00:02 | immediately |
is free of it. | |
1:00:08 | Right? I wonder |
if you see it. | |
1:00:10 | You are free of image. |
1:00:13 | So the next question is: |
1:00:17 | who is the creator |
of all this mischief? | |
1:00:30 | What time is it, sir? |
1:00:32 | Q:12.30. |
1:00:36 | K:An hour |
passes very quickly. | |
1:00:41 | Shall we go on with it? |
Q:Yes. | |
1:00:45 | K:So we are asking, who is the |
creator of all this mischief? | |
1:00:55 | So we must go into it |
very carefully. | |
1:01:02 | Man has given, human |
beings have given | |
1:01:06 | - when I say man, please I am |
including the woman | |
1:01:10 | don't let's get agitated |
about that! | |
1:01:17 | Gosh, words have |
become so loaded | |
1:01:27 | that we can never talk |
freely about anything. | |
1:01:35 | Human beings have given |
tremendous importance | |
1:01:41 | throughout the ages |
to thought. | |
1:01:47 | Right? |
1:01:50 | Thought has created |
the wars, | |
1:01:57 | thought has created |
the content of the churches | |
1:02:00 | and the architecture, |
1:02:05 | thought has created |
society - right? - | |
1:02:13 | thought has created the whole |
complex technological world, | |
1:02:22 | thought has created the division |
between the Arab and the Jew, | |
1:02:28 | between the American and the |
English, the German, the Italian, | |
1:02:32 | the Hindu, the Buddhist: |
thought has created this. | |
1:02:44 | And we have lived with it, |
this division | |
1:02:52 | which we have accepted |
as normal, natural, healthy | |
1:03:00 | and thought is the maker |
of all this division | |
1:03:09 | and therefore where there is |
division there must be conflict. | |
1:03:14 | Our intention, |
our meeting together | |
1:03:19 | these few mornings, |
is to eliminate conflict. | |
1:03:26 | Please see: only when you are |
free of conflict can there be love. | |
1:03:33 | Not all this nonsense |
talked about love. | |
1:03:39 | It's only the mind and |
the heart that is really | |
1:03:42 | free from all conflict |
1:03:45 | then only it is possible to know |
what compassion, what love is. | |
1:03:56 | I think we better stop, |
shan't we? | |
1:03:59 | I know we want to go on, |
we'll do it next Saturday | |
1:04:04 | or the day after tomorrow |
in questioning. | |
1:04:08 | Sir, this is a very |
complex problem | |
1:04:11 | which is the whole |
movement of thought. | |
1:04:18 | I'll go into it briefly and |
we will go on another time. | |
1:04:24 | Once you observe that thought |
has been responsible | |
1:04:31 | for this division, |
for the religious images, | |
1:04:39 | attributing to them |
all kinds of virtue and so on | |
1:04:47 | right through the world. |
1:04:52 | When the speaker goes to India, |
as he does every year, | |
1:04:59 | he says, you are the most |
superstitious people on earth. | |
1:05:05 | And when he comes here |
he also sees exactly the same thing. | |
1:05:12 | The image-worship, the preachers, |
the gurus - you follow? | |
1:05:22 | So thought has built the world |
both technologically, | |
1:05:30 | psychologically and the world of |
mischief, turmoil, anxiety, fear, | |
1:05:39 | destruction - you follow? - |
Thought has been responsible. | |
1:05:47 | So we have to enquire: |
what is thinking? | |
1:05:53 | What is the nature |
of thinking? | |
1:06:06 | Because |
we live by thinking. | |
1:06:11 | Everything you do |
is the result of thinking, | |
1:06:15 | your relationship with |
another, intimate or not, | |
1:06:19 | is in the movement |
of thinking. | |
1:06:29 | And if we do not |
understand the nature | |
1:06:33 | and the structure |
of thinking | |
1:06:38 | we will keep repeating |
the patterns of conflict, | |
1:06:44 | changing one pattern |
to another, | |
1:06:47 | hoping that pattern |
will solve the conflict. | |
1:06:51 | But these patterns, whether |
communist, capitalist, | |
1:06:56 | democratic, etc., etc., |
are created by thought. | |
1:07:03 | So thinking becomes |
extraordinarily important. | |
1:07:08 | And to find out |
what is this thinking | |
1:07:12 | that is making this enormous |
misery in the world. | |
1:07:18 | Do you understand, |
sirs? | |
1:07:28 | You must think |
if you do anything, | |
1:07:34 | if you are going home, |
or catching a bus, driving a car, | |
1:07:38 | there must be thinking, |
1:07:42 | either it is automatic, |
purposeful, clear, | |
1:07:47 | otherwise |
you can't do anything. | |
1:07:52 | And thinking is the central |
factor of our being. | |
1:08:02 | That's a fact. |
1:08:04 | Round that we build all kinds |
of pleasure, pain, fear, love, | |
1:08:11 | jealousy, that is the core, that |
is the heart of our existence. | |
1:08:22 | And what is thinking? |
1:08:28 | And what is memory? |
1:08:31 | If you have no memory |
there is no thinking. | |
1:08:34 | You understand? |
1:08:38 | A man in a state |
of amnesia... | |
1:08:44 | So memory |
is the core of it. Right? | |
1:08:52 | Memory of your wife, |
or your husband, | |
1:08:57 | or girl friend, or whatever |
it is, your memory. | |
1:09:02 | That memory is put together |
through experience. Right? | |
1:09:09 | Which becomes |
the knowledge. | |
1:09:12 | So your brain, the brain, |
which is not yours or mine, | |
1:09:17 | it is the brain of |
human beings | |
1:09:21 | - which is a marvellous thing |
if you see the fact, | |
1:09:25 | it is not your petty |
little brain | |
1:09:29 | but the brain that has been |
cultivated, grown, evolved, lived, | |
1:09:36 | suffered, pleasure, pain, |
that brain is our common factor. | |
1:09:46 | In that brain |
are the many cells | |
1:09:51 | which hold memory, |
like a computer. | |
1:09:56 | That memory is the result |
of experience, knowledge. | |
1:10:04 | So in the technological world |
that memory is absolutely necessary | |
1:10:16 | otherwise you can't |
write a letter, | |
1:10:19 | otherwise we can't speak |
English to each other, | |
1:10:22 | you may if you know French |
or Latin, and so on | |
1:10:25 | that's a different matter. |
1:10:27 | So memory at a certain level |
is absolutely necessary. | |
1:10:36 | And thinking, which has made |
this world into what it is: | |
1:10:44 | immoral, ugly, brutal, |
destructive, | |
1:10:51 | what place has thought? |
You understand? | |
1:10:55 | If it is only important |
in the technological world | |
1:11:02 | then what place |
has thought? | |
1:11:05 | You understand |
what I am saying? | |
1:11:09 | Has it any place at all? |
1:11:13 | No, we are thinking together, |
don't agree or disagree. | |
1:11:23 | Look, sir - I must stop, we'll go |
on, I'll just stop in a minute - | |
1:11:32 | Are you also working |
with me together? | |
1:11:35 | Aren't you tired? |
1:11:41 | No, you are not tired |
because you are not talking. | |
1:11:47 | You are not putting tremendous |
vitality into it. Right? | |
1:11:54 | You are not putting |
all your energy, your heart, | |
1:11:56 | your mind into it, |
that's why you are not tired. | |
1:12:02 | Because to you |
conflict is natural, | |
1:12:07 | you have accepted it, you don't |
want to break it, resolve it. | |
1:12:16 | So if you don't mind, |
we'll continue tomorrow. | |
1:12:20 | Not tomorrow, |
whenever it is. | |